Digital Theatre [DTheatre.com]
 SPONSOR
Search for  

NAVIGATION
HOME/NEWS
BUY DVDS
THE CHATBOARD
SUBMIT NEWS
HELP
COMPANY INFO
CONTACT US
LOGIN
Username:
Password:
Need an account?
Sign up Now!
Note: Logged in users do not have pop-ups and pop-unders.
More Options
User Utilities
Help

Quote of the day:

"The only way to keep your health is to eat what you don't want, drink what you don't like, and do what you'd rather not." - Mark Twain
COOL LINKS
find books, dvds and movies:



Topic: Film Review: What the Bleep Do We Know?
By Ag on February 26, 2004 4:12 PM

dTheatre.com is fortunate and proud to present the first internet review of "What the #$*! Do We Know?" (also known as What the Bleep?) a independent feature/documentary hybrid on mysticism and science. The film opens at the Bagdad Theater in Portland, OR starting on Friday, February 27th.


The Passion of the Nucleus:
“What the #$*!  Do We Know?”
Challenges Our Sacred Mad Cows
By
Andy Gurevich


I have this aunt who used to drive my family crazy. Her name was Joan but she changed it to Isis after eating some bad blotter acid at a Dead show in Ventura, California in 1974. She would blow in to the obligatory familial ceremonies like a Technicolor typhoon; always wearing bells, always with a different guy, and always vaguely smelling like feet. At my sister’s wedding reception, she went postal over the blatantly carnivorous menu. Turns out the carving station was not a carving station at all but a “monument to a silent and unnecessary avian holocaust.” Who knew? I will never forget the look on my father’s face when she grabbed the microphone from the DJ and launched into a twenty minute diatribe on the benefits of green tea and something called “Macrobiotics.”

I always loved her visits. Mostly because she got me stoned at some point during her stay. Aunt Isis said that marijuana helped to free your mind from the arbitrary boundaries of reality set by a mechanistic and archaic understanding of the universe. At least I think that’s what she said. I was usually distracted by my preternatural hunger for cheese flavored snacks by this point in our discussion. But I also loved how she was always able to disrupt things in my otherwise bland and mind-numbingly consistent, middle class reality. Sure, not everything she said was realistic, or even intelligible at times, but her presence represented something so significant, so radical, that everyone was drawn to it, either to extinguish or bask in its peculiar radiance. She exposed a paradigm that was so ingrained into my consciousness that I was often only able to see it through her skeptical, ironic eyes. You could ridicule Isis. You could worship her. What you could not do very easily, however, was ignore her.

I thought of my flamboyant aunt as I watched a recent screening of The Independent feature/documentary hybrid on mysticism and science, "What the $#*! Do We Know?" starring Marlee Matlin. Filmed almost entirely in Portland, the film is an ambitious, if uneven, cinematic event that combines various technical and storytelling mediums to explore the mind’s extraordinary ability to participate in the creation of reality; a notion with such significant scientific, political and religious connotations that I am surprised the film hasn’t already been buried in the interest of “national security.”

What the #$*! Do We Know: A Quantum Fable, which will begin a run at McMenamins’ Bagdad theater on Friday, February 27, features Academy Award ‘ Winner Marlee Matlin who plays Amanda, a divorced photographer, who finds herself plummeted into an “Alice-in-Wonderland” rabbit-hole experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the cellular, molecular, and even quantum worlds, which lie beneath.  “Science has been saying the mind affects reality for quite some time,” says William Arntz, the film’s writer, director and producer.  “This is the first non-fantasy film that not only says this, but shows mind/matter interaction and does it in a thoroughly entertaining way.”  

The film employs interviews with leading scientists and mystics who act as a sort of Greek Chorus, including University of Oregon’s own Institute of Theoretical Science Physicist, Professor, and author Amit Goswami, who introduce new concepts that then occur in Amanda’s increasingly unusual world. Betsy Chasse, who co-wrote, directed and produced the film, states, “We wanted to put today’s maverick scientists front and center and show the bizarre quantum world in a way that is entertaining and thought-provoking.  That it is a hit with the audiences tells us that intelligent entertainment is the future of film.”

The film uses the advances in Quantum Physics to explore human psychology and its role, much more active and participatory than previously believed, in the creation of reality.  The question is posed early in the film, “How can we continue to see the world as real if the self that is determining it as real is intangible?” Quantum Physics is described as the “science of possibilities,”  a discipline that begins to blend into a very real and humbling mysticism the further one pursues it.

In fact, herein lies the film’s most inspiring achievement. The filmmakers have done a remarkable job not only in making Quantum Physics interesting and accessible to us common folk but in showing the very real and pragmatic implications this enigmatic science has for humanity. Although the animation is at times a bit sophomoric and the dramatic sequences tend towards the stereotypical and contrived, this is an important film, a groundbreaking work both in form and content.

Arntz, Chasse, and Mark Vicente, the film’s director of photography, feel they have developed a form that audiences are craving – that in essence, “We're re-defining the word "documentary."  Just like the outrageously successful book The Da Vinci Code, which has become an overwhelming phenomenon in the publishing world with 4.5 million copies in print, factual information is used within a contemporary story line to provide the audience with a multifaceted, holistic experience that is meant to inform the audience through entertainment. The filmmakers concur, adding, “From the great success of our preview run, we see that Hollywood will have to wake up to the enormous audience out there, who want intelligent entertainment.”

At no time in recent history has the definition of reality brought with it such drastic consequences. The stakes are high and it is no exaggeration to state that our future as a race hangs in the balance. What the #$*! Do We Know: A Quantum Fable, is a starting point, an invitation to join the discussion. The world’s oldest questions are examined in a fresh light; one that is fueled by possibilities rather than threatened by them.

It appears my aunt Isis was right after all. The years of suffering insults at the hands of closed minded, epistemological tyrants who berated her ideas with pejoratives like “hippie” and “New Age”  are now fading away into the shadows cast by the older systems of fear and control. One can only hope that audiences will follow this film into the strange and wonderful world of Quantum Physics; thus gaining a fuller appreciation for the beauty of paradox  and the essential connection of all things. Just make sure you smoke a joint first for full effect.

“What the Bleep Do We Know?” opens at the Bagdad Theater starting on Friday, February 27th; (see mcmenamins.com or call (503) 236-9234 or (503)225-5555, ext. 8831 for show times).

  Visit The Official Site [ comment on this story | comments (10) ]
Reader Discussions:
 this really is a rabbit hole...   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 2, 2004 11:56 PM

...and doesn't have much to do with real science. The film invokes quantum mechanics in the most superficial way ("did you know you never actually touch anything") and then goes on and on about how unintuitive the quantum world is. That's certainly true. However, the film then constructs an "alternative intuition", if you will, that reality doesn't really exist, or that it's really constructed by our consciousness, that our brains don't know the difference between reality and memory because they look the same on PET scans, etc., etc. (sound like your inane philosophy 101 discussions?).

A more prosaic explanation might be that since we don't experience the quantum world in any sort of everyday way (that's why they build the big particle accelerators), there is no reason to expect that our intuition or senses would have evolved to understand the quantum world easily, in the way we understand time, cause and effect, or gravity on an everyday level. In other words, maybe quantum mechanics is hard to understand because our brains haven't *had* to understand it until very recently, and so we have to use our intellectual capacities to study it as an advanced physics subject (in the same way we study reading or math, which also are not part of our evolutionary past). Of course, such an explanation would be a real downer, since it wouldn't allow for all the new age self-actualization talk that makes up the last half of the film. Gee, reality bites...

There is one thing that this film does *really* well, although I think it's unintentional. It does a superb job of showing how desperate we humans can be to impose reason, purpose, and meaning on the chaotic and uncaring universe we live in, jettisoning our better judgement in the process. We as a society don't seem able to accept that reality may not be intuitive and that there may not be some uber-being out there with a plan and reason for our existence. There's a lot we don't know, and lots of mystery left in the world; but rather than accept it as mysterious, we have to replace the mystery with what we want to be true.

Oh, and the filmmakers also showed that if you wrap up lame fragments of quantum, new age self-help blather, religion-bashing, addiction and body image issues, and cosmic interconnectedness into one big hallucinatory fattie, you'll sell a lot of tickets in Portland! But hey, they took some great footage of this beautiful town (especially its wonderful light-rail system), so I guess not every frame is a bad joke...just don't think this is a NOVA special or even close to that credible.

20
 RE: this really is a rabbit hole...   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 10, 2004 1:49 PM

whatever...stupid jew.

 ?   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2004 8:12 AM

Dude, U suck.

20
 RE: ?   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 15, 2004 1:46 PM

i was obviously just kidding. the response is thought provoking and essentially sound. the person makes some truly astute observations about the nature of the film and the reality of its creator's motives. my review does not attempt to endorse or even understand the film's metaphysical scaffolding. on the contrary, the truthfullness of the elements was of no concern to me. i was interested in the attempt, the model, as an intellectual exercise. that's why i started with the story about my aunt. the value in these paradigm shaking texts lies in their ability to subvert our unchecked biases, resulting in a humility and acceptance of others and a renewed thirst for knowledge and wisdom. sure, new age boneheads will and often do try to ride this wave of intellectual optimism all the way to the shore, but what ultimately is the harm in that if they bring a reconcilliatory and communal epistemology along with them. try the model on and see not if it is true but rather how much it helps you come to terms with your own essential limitation. herein lies its primary value. sorry again about the jew comment but i was in a hurry.

 My 2 Cent Review   > reply 
Posted by Jack (jack@dtheatre.com) on March 3, 2004 10:21 AM

Perhaps it was because I followed Andy's advice and smoked a joint for the "full effect," but I thought What the #$*! Do We Know? was pretty good. Definitely the best indie, maybe even the best movie to come out of Portland since Zero Effect or My Own Private Idaho. The story segments and animations which run parallel with the documentary were a bit cheesy but mostly tolerable and well produced. I was however a little creeped out by Ramtha.. What The Bleep?!

 about   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 3, 2004 12:08 PM

If you go to the film's official site it claims that "Ramtha" is a 35,000 year old individual who has channeled his consciousness into a contemporary woman named JZ Knight. Then it conjures up some polygraph vodoo to justify this claim. I agree...what the fuck? I imagine they didn't put this in the end bios because they thought that this claim was too much for the audiece to stomach...


 My 50cent review Yo   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 4, 2004 1:48 AM

Like the Matrix?

 Quality of "what the bleep"   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 12, 2004 4:04 PM

Whether "what the bleep" was an incredibly approachable view on a vast topic, or an incredibly "new agey" mumbo-jumbo version should be moot. The fact that it attempts to broach the topic is amazing. The fact that people are enjoying it is even more so. I'd rather have ten movies like this than one "Rambo".

 some and repudiators   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 15, 2004 1:39 AM

some will repudiate any event in the world- the first commentary on the review seemed to do so - One might miss the point of the movie easily that is well expressed by one of the scientists- there is no sin -- he says " there is only evolution and devolution" that is the whole perspective, ideal, and aim of the movie- to repudiate it as quantamly unsatisfying or saying it is not credible- evokes a particular spirit of the majority of the scientific world that the author of the first comment seems to agree with - that science is valid - that is more than that a God -- it is admitted and displayed in the film that God is far above the mention of any one within this realm -- this imbecile seems to have replaced that notion with a self righteous ethic based solely in intellectual understand rather than appreciate that someone is challenging folks to look froward and askance at typical values, paradigms and peer in a more sublime fashion into the workings of understanding-- for a scientific bozo who'd like to explain the universe as if he was standing outside of it - this movie falls far short as does his life and ideal, but for a being who wants to understand to a simply greater degree their own interactions and positions within that universe this film is an inspiration, consideration and in its highest possible regard a prayer, so along with the priests of puritan value you can burn in the hell that you  have created, mr. epistemologist - is this my resentment - well you lit the match with your arrogant reprisal against a truer human's honest work... but I don't mean anything and you're the God who understands the workings of this world, right?

 ?   > reply 
Posted by A random shemp (No Email) on March 15, 2004 7:48 AM

Like 9/11?


Post YOUR opinion!

 


Support dtheatre.com: Get cool merchandise!

Search dvds by keyword or cast:

Terminator 3: Widescreen

Terminator 3 - Rise of the Machines (Widescreen Edition)
Directed by: Jonathan Mostow
Starring: Ah-nuld "Tha Governator or Gropinator" Schwarzenegger, Claire Danes, Kristanna Loken, Nick Stahl
New: $17.97

Pirates of the Caribbean

Pirates of the Caribbean - The Curse of the Black Pearl
Directed by: Gore Verbinski
Starring: Jonny Depp, Orlando Bloom
New: $17.99

The Matrix Reloaded

The Matrix Reloaded (Widescreen Edition)
Plot Outline: Dude whoa! Hi-yaah! hi-yaah! Boom!
New: 19.47 | Used: starting at $7.50


CURRENT HOT TOPICS

Mel Gibson's Passion of Money Kills Old Lady (59)

BATMAN: BEGINS Teaser Poster!!! (11)

Review: What the Bleep Do We Know? (10)

RECENT HEADLINES

THUNDERBIRDS Trailer Online

Johnny Depp No Match for Jesus

I, ROBOT 1st Full Trailer Online (2)

Exclusive Alien Vs. Predator Trailer Online (2)

New BATMAN: BEGINS Script Review!! (10)

German CG Movie: Back to Gaya (4)

BATMAN: BEGINS Teaser Poster!!! (11)

JESUS Beats Shit Out of Starsky and Hutch (6)

SENSELESS SURVEY
Who Wrote The Passion of the Christ?
Pat Robertson
Jesus H. Christ
Mad Max
God
Jack


[view results]

DONATE!
Support DT! Donate With PayPal:
LINK US!

dtheatre.com
dtheatre.com

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the poster. The rest © 2000 Digital Theatre, an Ai Graphics (AIGC) Production.